You are here: ASAP > Discussion > OCA/H adjustments

Quick links
ImageIFR Procedure Design Services
ImageList of all ASAP s.r.o. Services
ImageGPS / GNSS Procedures Design
ImageInternational forum for discussion and information concerning IFR procedure design.
ImagePHX Software for Aeronautical Charting and IFR Procedure Design

OCA/H adjustments

28.10.2004

Submission:

The question I have is concerning "adjustments" (see paragraph 6.4.6 c) to the OCA/H and whether or not they to should or should not also be subtracted in the determination of the missed approach surface formula.

The missed approach surface formula (Chapter 21 (ILS) Paragraph 21.5.3.3.2. says (OCA/Hps - HL) + do * TanZ - MOC. This is rather straight forward but what happens in the case of a Remote Altimeter Setting (RAS) adjustment?

In the non-precision case

Should one be compensating for the RAS adjustment in the missed approach as well? To be able to check for obstacle penetrations one would have to:

Subtract the HL, do * TanZ, plus the MOC, PLUS the RAS adjustment

However aren't we penalizing ourselves twice, once by raising the OCA/H and then again by subtracting the RAS adjustment in the missed approach?

In the precision case

By increasing the OCA/H for RAS the aircraft is further on the GP so that when we minus the HL we are indeed starting our missed approach surface at the right height. So it seems the formula is correct in the precision case but the non-precision case is still in doubt.


B. Frenz - The MITRE Corporation - USA

Do you want comment this article or ask something?
Fill the submission form »

« back to Discussion page